A comparison of ecosystem services delivered by 11 long-term monitoring sites in the UK environmental change network

A - Papers appearing in refereed journals

Dick, J., Andrews, C., Beaumont, D. A., Benham, S., Brooks, D. R., Corbett, S., Lloyd, D., Mcmillan, S., Monteith, D. T., Pilgrim, E. S., Rose, R., Scott, T., Scott, A., Smith, R. I., Taylor, C., Taylor, M., Turner, A. and Watson, H. 2011. A comparison of ecosystem services delivered by 11 long-term monitoring sites in the UK environmental change network. Environmetrics. 22 (5), pp. 639-648. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.1069

AuthorsDick, J., Andrews, C., Beaumont, D. A., Benham, S., Brooks, D. R., Corbett, S., Lloyd, D., Mcmillan, S., Monteith, D. T., Pilgrim, E. S., Rose, R., Scott, T., Scott, A., Smith, R. I., Taylor, C., Taylor, M., Turner, A. and Watson, H.
Abstract

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA 2003) framework was applied to provide a holistic assessment and comparison of ecosystem services delivery from 11 environmental change network (ECN) sites, following a workshop of ECN site managers. A list of common variables was agreed to represent the high level categories defined by the MA. The resultant 73 variables, either direct ecosystem services or proxies, were divided into two subsets (readily accessible biogeographical data from all sites and additional site specific data). Similarity analysis of the biogeographical data indicated four site clusters: land with at least 50% forest cover, productive livestock farmland, uplands and a lowland grass/arable group. The first three clusters were also evident for both the additional data and for the larger combined dataset. The lowland grass/arable sites were a 'mixed use' cluster that was not apparent in the analysis of the additional or combined datasets indicating a mismatch between particular ecosystem services and specific landscapes/habitats. Procrustes analysis of the biogeographical data and the combined dataset suggested that the primary differences between datasets were due to variables associated with local management decisions which prevented harvesting of provisioning services or denied public access to the site. Drawing on comparable data from some of the most intensively researched and monitored ecosystems in the UK, this study demonstrates the challenges and limitations involved in attempting holistic assessments of ecosystem services at the site and inter-site level and highlights the importance of both local expert knowledge and consistent scientific measurement in contributing to the process. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

KeywordsEnvironmental Sciences; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Statistics & Probability
Year of Publication2011
JournalEnvironmetrics
Journal citation22 (5), pp. 639-648
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1002/env.1069
Open accessPublished as non-open access
FunderAgri-Food and Biosciences Institute (Northern Ireland)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Countryside Council for Wales
National Assembly for Wales
Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
NERC - Natural Environment Research Council
Northern Ireland Environment Agency
Scottish Environment Protection Agency
Scottish Government, Scottish Natural Heritage
DEFRA - Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs UK
Forestry Commission
Environment Agency
Funder project or codeSEF
North Wyke Research (NWR)
Maintaining soil resilience and function for sustainable land management
Project: 5999
Population and community ecology: conservation and dynamics
Quantifying ecosystem function and production in grassland landscapes
PublisherWiley
ISSN1180-4009

Permalink - https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/8q81z/a-comparison-of-ecosystem-services-delivered-by-11-long-term-monitoring-sites-in-the-uk-environmental-change-network

Restricted files

Publisher's version

Under embargo indefinitely

102 total views
2 total downloads
0 views this month
0 downloads this month