A - Papers appearing in refereed journals
Janzen, H. H., Van Groenigen, K. J., Powlson, D. S., Schwinghamer, T. and Van Groenigen, J. W. 2022. Photosynthetic limits on carbon sequestration in croplands. Geoderma. 416 (15 June), p. 115810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115810
Authors | Janzen, H. H., Van Groenigen, K. J., Powlson, D. S., Schwinghamer, T. and Van Groenigen, J. W. |
---|---|
Abstract | How much C can be stored in agricultural soils worldwide to mitigate rising CO2 concentrations, and at what cost? This question, because of its critical relevance to climate policy, has been a focus of soil science for decades. The amount of additional soil organic C (SOC) that could be stored has been estimated in various ways, most of which have taken the soil as the starting point: projecting how much of the SOC previously lost can be restored, for example, or calculating the cumulative effect of multiple soil management strategies. Here, we take a different approach, recognizing that photosynthesis, the source of C input to soil, represents the most fundamental constraint to C sequestration. We follow a simple “Fermi approach” to derive a rough but robust estimate by reducing our problem to a series of approximate relations that can be parameterized using data from the literature. We distinguish two forms of soil C: ‘ephemeral C’, denoting recently-applied plant-derived C that is quickly decayed to CO2, and ‘lingering C’, which remains in the soil long enough to serve as a lasting repository for C derived from atmospheric CO2. First, we estimate global net C inputs into lingering SOC in croplands from net primary production, biomass removal by humans and short-term decomposition. Next, we estimate net additional C storage in cropland soils globally from the estimated C inputs, accounting also for decomposition of lingering SOC already present. Our results suggest a maximum C input rate into the lingering SOC pool of 0.44 Pg C yr-1, and a maximum net sequestration rate of 0.14 Pg C yr-1 – significantly less than most previous estimates, even allowing for acknowledged uncertainties. More importantly, we argue for a re-orientation in emphasis from soil processes towards a wider ecosystem perspective, starting with photosynthesis. |
Keywords | Carbon sequestration ; Photosynthesis ; Croplands ; Decomposition |
Year of Publication | 2022 |
Journal | Geoderma |
Journal citation | 416 (15 June), p. 115810 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115810 |
Open access | Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access |
Funder | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council |
Funder project or code | S2N - Soil to Nutrition - Work package 1 (WP1) - Optimising nutrient flows and pools in the soil-plant-biota system |
Publisher's version | |
Accepted author manuscript | |
Supplemental file | |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 15 Mar 2022 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 03 Mar 2022 |
Publisher | Elsevier Science Bv |
ISSN | 0016-7061 |
Permalink - https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/9867x/photosynthetic-limits-on-carbon-sequestration-in-croplands