A - Papers appearing in refereed journals
Carswell, A. M., Shaw, R., Hunt, J., Sanchez-Rodriguez, A. R., Saunders, K. S., Cotton, J., Hill, P. W., Chadwick, D. R., Jones, D. L. and Misselbrook, T. H. 2018. Assessing the benefits and wider costs of different N fertilisers for grassland agriculture . Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 65 (5), pp. 625 - 639. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1519251
Authors | Carswell, A. M., Shaw, R., Hunt, J., Sanchez-Rodriguez, A. R., Saunders, K. S., Cotton, J., Hill, P. W., Chadwick, D. R., Jones, D. L. and Misselbrook, T. H. |
---|---|
Abstract | Fertiliser nitrogen (N) is essential for maintaining agronomic outputs for our growing population. However, the societal, economic and environmental impacts of excess reactive N from fertiliser is rarely assessed. Here the agronomic, economic and environmental efficacy of three N-fertiliser sources, ammonium-nitrate (AN), urea (U), and inhibited-urea (IU; with NPBT) were evaluated at two grassland sites. Dry matter yield and herbage quality was measured at each silage-cut. Additionally, NH3-N and N2O-N losses were measured and used to calculate the effective N source cost and externality costs, which account for associated environmental and societal impacts. We found no effect of different N sources on yield or herbage quality. However, NH3-N emissions were significantly reduced under the IU treatment, by 48-65%. No significant differences in cumulative N2O emissions were observed. Incorporating externality costs increased fertiliser prices by 1.23-2.36, 6.51-16.4, and 3.17-4.17 times the original cost, for AN, U and IU, respectively, transforming U from the cheapest, to the most expensive of the N sources examined. However, with no apparent yield differences between N-fertiliser sources there is no economic incentive for the land-manager to use the more environmentally and socially acceptable option, unless externality costs are incorporated into fertiliser prices at the point of sale. |
Keywords | Ammonia; Fertilizer management; Greenhouse gas emissions; Urease inhibitor; Nitrous oxide |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Journal | Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science |
Journal citation | 65 (5), pp. 625 - 639 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1519251 |
Open access | Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access |
Funder | BBSRC Newton funding |
Funder project or code | UK - China Virtual Joint Centre for Improved Nitrogen Agronomy (CINAG) |
Publisher's version | Copyright license CC BY |
Accepted author manuscript | Copyright license CC BY |
Output status | E-publication ahead of print |
Publication dates | |
Online | 22 Sep 2018 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 29 Aug 2018 |
ISSN | 0365-0340 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Permalink - https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/84881/assessing-the-benefits-and-wider-costs-of-different-n-fertilisers-for-grassland-agriculture