Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK

A - Papers appearing in refereed journals

Jebari, A., Takahashi, T., Lee, M. R. F., Collins, A. L., Coleman, K., Carswell, A. M., Segura, C., Cardenas, L. M. and Mcauliffe, G. 2025. Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02428-9

AuthorsJebari, A., Takahashi, T., Lee, M. R. F., Collins, A. L., Coleman, K., Carswell, A. M., Segura, C., Cardenas, L. M. and Mcauliffe, G.
Abstract

Purpose: Agri-food systems across the globe are faced with the challenge of reducing their supply-chain emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4). For instance, 10% of the UK’s GHG emissions are generated by agriculture, and ~56% of these are generated by livestock production. Numerous mitigation measures are being proposed to reduce GHG emissions from ruminants (representing 70 to 80% of total livestock emissions), particularly from beef cattle (presenting 30-40% of total livestock emissions).
Methods: To explore such potential, first, a business-as-usual (BAU) partial cradle-to-finishing farmgate scale modelling framework was developed. The BAU systems (i.e., steady-state productivity based on primary data from the North Wyke Farm Platform) were built using ensemble modelling wherein the RothC process-based soil organic carbon (SOC) model was integrated into the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework to conduct a trade-off analysis related to mitigation measures applicable to the study system. Potential mitigation measures were applied to the BAU scenario. The interventions assessed included: (i) extensification; (ii) adopting anaerobic digestion technology, and; (iii) the use of the nitrification inhibitor DCD, and substitution of fertiliser nitrogen with symbiotically fixed nitrogen from legumes.
Results: The partial carbon footprint for 1 kg of beef liveweight gain leaving the farmgate could be reduced by 7.5%, 12%, or 26% by adopting nitrification inhibitors, white clover introduction (pending establishment success), and anaerobic digestion for manure management, respectively.
Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of including emissions beyond the farmgate level to analyse the carbon footprint of different management scenarios in order to assess the sustainability of agri-food production systems.

KeywordsSoil organic carbon; Carbon footprint; Extensification; Anaerobic digestion; Nitrification inhibitor
Year of Publication2025
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02428-9
Open accessPublished as ‘gold’ (paid) open access
FunderGlobal Challenges Research Fund (UKRI)
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Funder project or codeResilient Farming Futures
S2N - Soil to Nutrition - Work package 2 (WP2) - Adaptive management systems for improved efficiency and nutritional quality
S2N - Soil to Nutrition - Work package 3 (WP3) - Sustainable intensification - optimisation at multiple scales
Growing Health [ISP]
Resilient Farming Futures (WP1): Understanding impacts of single and compound climate policy and biotic stresses on agroecosystem ‘resilience’
The North Wyke Farm Platform- National Capability [2023-28]
Publisher's version
Accepted author manuscript
Supplemental file
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online14 Jan 2025
Publication process dates
Accepted27 Dec 2024
PublisherSpringer
ISSN0948-3349

Permalink - https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/992y5/carbon-footprints-of-greenhouse-gas-mitigation-measures-for-a-grass-based-beef-cattle-finishing-system-in-the-uk

2 total views
2 total downloads
2 views this month
2 downloads this month
Download files as zip