Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK

Jebari, AsmaORCID logo, Takahashi, TaroORCID logo, Lee, Michael, Collins, AdrianORCID logo, Coleman, Kevin, Carswell, AlisonORCID logo, Segura-Quirante, CarmenORCID logo, Cardenas, LauraORCID logo and Mcauliffe, Graham (2025) Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 30. pp. 654-667. 10.1007/s11367-025-02428-9
Copy

Purpose: Agri-food systems across the globe are faced with the challenge of reducing their supply-chain emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4). For instance, 10% of the UK’s GHG emissions are generated by agriculture, and ~56% of these are generated by livestock production. Numerous mitigation measures are being proposed to reduce GHG emissions from ruminants (representing 70 to 80% of total livestock emissions), particularly from beef cattle (presenting 30-40% of total livestock emissions). Methods: To explore such potential, first, a business-as-usual (BAU) partial cradle-to-finishing farmgate scale modelling framework was developed. The BAU systems (i.e., steady-state productivity based on primary data from the North Wyke Farm Platform) were built using ensemble modelling wherein the RothC process-based soil organic carbon (SOC) model was integrated into the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) framework to conduct a trade-off analysis related to mitigation measures applicable to the study system. Potential mitigation measures were applied to the BAU scenario. The interventions assessed included: (i) extensification; (ii) adopting anaerobic digestion technology, and; (iii) the use of the nitrification inhibitor DCD, and substitution of fertiliser nitrogen with symbiotically fixed nitrogen from legumes. Results: The partial carbon footprint for 1 kg of beef liveweight gain leaving the farmgate could be reduced by 7.5%, 12%, or 26% by adopting nitrification inhibitors, white clover introduction (pending establishment success), and anaerobic digestion for manure management, respectively. Conclusions: The findings highlight the importance of including emissions beyond the farmgate level to analyse the carbon footprint of different management scenarios in order to assess the sustainability of agri-food production systems.


picture_as_pdf
s11367-025-02428-9.pdf
subject
Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Accepted Version
Creative Commons Attribution

Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution

Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution

EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core OpenURL ContextObject RIOXX2 XML OpenURL ContextObject in Span Data Cite XML OPENAIRE MPEG-21 DIDL METS HTML Citation MODS ASCII Citation
Export

Downloads