A - Papers appearing in refereed journals
Chadwick, D. R., Cardenas, L. M., Dhanoa, M. S., Donovan, N., Misselbrook, T. H., Williams, J. R., Thorman, R. E., McGeough, K. L., Watson, C. J., Bell, M., Anthony, S. G. and Rees, R. M. 2018. The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: Quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories. Science of the Total Environment. 635, pp. 607-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.152
Authors | Chadwick, D. R., Cardenas, L. M., Dhanoa, M. S., Donovan, N., Misselbrook, T. H., Williams, J. R., Thorman, R. E., McGeough, K. L., Watson, C. J., Bell, M., Anthony, S. G. and Rees, R. M. |
---|---|
Abstract | Urine patches and dung pats from grazing livestock create hotspots for production and emission of the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N2O), and represent a large proportion of total N2O emissions in many national agricultural greenhouse gas inventories. As such, there is much interest in developing country specific N2O emission factors (EFs) for excretal nitrogen (EF3, pasture, range and paddock) deposited during gazing. The aims of this study were to generate separate N2O emissions data for cattle derived urine and dung, to provide an evidence base for the generation of a country specific EF for the UK from this nitrogen source. The experiments were also designed to determine the effects of site and timing of application on emissions, and the efficacy of the nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD) on N2O losses. This co-ordinated set of 15 plot-scale, year-long field experiments using static chambers was conducted at five grassland sites, typical of the soil and climatic zones of grazed grassland in the UK. We show that the average urine and dung N2O EFs were 0.69% and 0.19%, respectively, resulting in a combined excretal N2O EF (EF3), of 0.49%, which is b25% of the IPCC default EF3 for excretal returns fromgrazing cattle. Regression analysis suggests that urineN2O EFs were controlledmore by composition than was the case for dung, whilst dung N2O EFs were more related to soil and environmental factors. The urine N2O EF was significantly greater from the site in SW England, and significantly greater from the early grazing season urine application than later applications. Dycandiamide reduced the N2O EF fromurine patches by an average |
Keywords | Grassland; Greenhouse gas; Nitrous oxide; Cattle; Urine patch; Dung pat; Nitrification inhibitor; Dicyandiamide; Inventory |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Journal citation | 635, pp. 607-617 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.152 |
Open access | Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access |
Funder | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council |
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs | |
Funder project or code | S2N - Soil to Nutrition - Work package 2 (WP2) - Adaptive management systems for improved efficiency and nutritional quality |
InveN20ry project AC0116 | |
Publisher's version | Copyright license CC BY |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 24 Apr 2018 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 10 Apr 2018 |
Publisher | Elsevier Science Bv |
ISSN | 0048-9697 |
Permalink - https://repository.rothamsted.ac.uk/item/847wz/the-contribution-of-cattle-urine-and-dung-to-nitrous-oxide-emissions-quantification-of-country-specific-emission-factors-and-implications-for-national-inventories